Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(client/electron): correct filepath for unpacking tun2socks #1937

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2024

Conversation

sbruens
Copy link
Contributor

@sbruens sbruens commented Mar 29, 2024

No description provided.

@sbruens sbruens requested a review from a team as a code owner March 29, 2024 12:32
@sbruens sbruens changed the title fix(electron): correct filepath for unpacking tun2socks fix(client/electron): correct filepath for unpacking tun2socks Mar 29, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 32%. Comparing base (6aaaf70) to head (d0daa3a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #1937   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage      32%     32%           
======================================
  Files          45      45           
  Lines        2620    2620           
  Branches      340     340           
======================================
  Hits          860     860           
  Misses       1760    1760           
Flag Coverage Δ
apple 15% <ø> (ø)
ios 15% <ø> (ø)
maccatalyst 15% <ø> (ø)
macos 15% <ø> (ø)
unittests 32% <ø> (ø)
www 40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fortuna fortuna removed the request for review from a team March 29, 2024 14:28
@sbruens sbruens merged commit e32363a into master Mar 29, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
@sbruens sbruens deleted the sbruens/electron branch March 29, 2024 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants